Recently, an opioid crisis has hit the USA, which have resulted in a state of emergency. “The opioid catastrophe is an emergency, and I’m saying publicly right now it is an emergency. It’s a nationwide emergency. We’re going to devote a lot of period, a lot of determination and a lot of money on the opioid catastrophe,” President Donald Trump stated.

It’s expected that President Trump was prejudiced by a temporary report that was offered to him by the Commission on Combating Drug Addition and the Opioid Crisis, which related the nation’s overdose death count to the count that caused from the extremist attacks on 9-11: “With roughly 142 Americans dying every single passing day, America is enduring a death toll equivalent to September 11th each three weeks,” the commission’s interim report stated. And the commission advised the president to announce a nationwide emergency under either the Public Health Service Act or the Stafford Act.

The news arrives just days next Trump management officials, with Secretary of Health and Human Services Tom Price, recommended that Trump should not announce a national emergency. “We trust at this point that the funds we want or the attention that we need to bring to bear to the opioid disaster, at this point, can be talked without the announcement of an emergency,” Price said, although he made clear that the choice remains “on the table.”

“With roughly 142 people dying every day, America is moving to a death toll equal to September 11th every three weeks,” the commission’s report claims. “Afterward September 11th, our President and our nation banded collectively to practice every tool at our disposal to avoid any more American deaths. Your announcement would authorize your cabinet to take courageous steps and would force Congress to put effort on backing and permitting the Executive Branch even further to deal with this cost of life.”

The instant influence of such a declaration, some experts said, is it would send a message.

“When an emergency is stated in any country of the world, whether it’s by the president or by a national governor, the primary thing that it does is give the public announcement,” Rutkow said. “In many ways, it’s a communication tool to show that how severe a specific danger is. It takes public support in every way. It gives awareness to people and so we can prevent further losses of precious lives.

Medical Marijuana


The word medical marijuana refers to consuming the whole, unrefined marijuana plant or its simple extracts to cure signs of disorders and other medical conditions. The U.S. Food and Medication Administration (FDA) has not acknowledged the marijuana plant as medication to treat ailments. Often, people become mixed up among the terms cannabis and marijuana. Cannabis is a type for a plant species that contains both hemp and marijuana. For a number of people, the finest way to think about cannabis is with a similarity: hemp and marijuana are to cannabis as lemons and oranges are to citrus. Two connected but dissimilar plants, from the identical family.

How long has medical marijuana been used?

Cannabis and Marijuana have been used for medical purposes since at least the time of early China. With regards to the United States’ pharmacological system, cannabis was long incorporated as a feasible medical cure option. It wasn’t until 1937 when, in defiance of the American Medical Association, the U.S. approved a federal law prohibiting cannabis. According to the Americans for Safe Access, from that point on cannabis was only lawfully accessible to a small number of patients in each state through a federally controlled program called the Investigational New Drug (IND) empathetic access investigation program. In effect, the IND program permitted national patients to take up to nine pounds of cannabis from the national government each year, in 1976.

Where it is legal?

Each state has different medical marijuana laws. Medical marijuana regulations are normally created in one of two ways: either by a states voter backed advantage like in California or through a states judicial body as in the situation of Pennsylvania. While states voter initiatives must be permitted to be included to ballots only on voting years, state lawmakers can announce a legalized medical marijuana bill whenever the state administrations are in assembly.

So far, 29 states have recognized medical marijuana programs. These states contain: AlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareHawaiiIllinoisMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMontanaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth DakotaOhioOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandVermontWashington and West Virginia.

Recently, 5 more states allowing legalized medical marijuana for medical purposes have been added. Utah, Oklahoma, Missouri, District of Columbia ( Washington DC) and Florida.


Medical Marijuana Medical Marijuana in America

 Benefits of Medical Marijuana

While the benefits of medical marijuana have been calculated since the 1940s, the most revolutionary findings about cannabis and its healing effects for medical ailments have only appeared in the last decade or so as awareness in the supportive properties of medical cannabis or marijuana has developed.

Modern studies propose that cannabis, marijuana or certain mixtures within it, have the potential to ease symptoms from the following medical conditions:



Posted on

September 14, 2017

Healthcare for Addicts

GOP rejects Obamacare… Who will it affect?

While it may be of no surprise to many that Trump is not doing what he promised, such as not interfering with Medicaid. He promised all the voters that he will provide insurance to everyone in need but the recent decision to repeal Obamacare has caused a fury among many.


There are 15-20 million people who are on Medicaid and they will suffer the consequences of this decision. It will cause a negative impact and the road to recovery for many patients will be obstructed. The United Sates already has a very shaky medical insurance system compared to other developed countries in Europe so it is going to cause a huge dent in the policies of the Trump administration. Here are the people that are going to be affected because of this:


Drug addiction treatment

If Obamacare is repealed , Treatment will be out of reach for most addicts. Families who covered for substance abuse will have to change coverage. Addiction treatment centers charge thousands of dollars for rehab. If the congress takes out the mandatory substance abuse coverage for all people , state run facilities will be the only option. These places are already overcrowded and have no beds for drug addicts.

People who are in rehab centers or the ones who go to clinics to be treated for drug abuse are going to have problems getting their treatments. It is not easy to leave the path of drug abuse behind and get help and on top of that a new law that would stop providing medical aid to people who are suffering from substance abuse will make it harder. This could likely cause them to go back to doing drugs or they may end suffering even more severe consequences in the form of relapse.


Senior citizens

Medicaid is something the senior citizens rely on to ensure their medical bills are covered. Families struggle to support old members because they already have so much to worry about paying, insurance, college tuition and various other expenses. Paying for a senior citizen’s medical bills puts a heavy burden on families. Nursing home and hospital bills would only deter someone to seek medical assistance and it will ruin their health.


There are also many seniors who have no families looking after them and Medicaid is the only hope they have. Almost 2/3 of the nursing home population relies on Medicaid so you can imagine how many lives are going to be affected by this.



Over 30 million children rely on Medicaid for various reasons. Some have life threatening diseases, while others have injuries that need to be taken care of by the hospital. Not all families can afford quality healthcare and if Obamacare is repealed, millions of children’s lives will be drastically affected. Their chances of getting ahead in life will be greatly diminished and only the children of the rich will prosper. Families would have to struggle to make their ends meet just because of the expensive healthcare bills.


People with disabilities

Medicaid provides people with disabilities a way to enhance their way of living. Over 10 million people with disabilities rely on it to cover for their expenses. People with disabilities have a lesser chance of doing a job properly and so whatever they will earn is going to go straight to their medical bills.



Women require Medicaid to help them in acquiring reproductive health services. Affording a quality maternal healthcare will only be a luxury of the few. There are post-pregnancy medical treatments and for many women that won’t be covered if Obamacare is repealed.


Medicaid is an essential program that enhances the lives of every demographic and community. Repealing it would only cause more problems in the future. Unless the Trump administration comes up with something better to assist the people with, there seems to be a gloomy future for people with medical needs.

Opioid Epidemic Looms in the US: GOP’s Proposed Cuts to Medicaid Threaten Treatment for Opioid Addiction

The fight to combat the opioid crisis is a key issue that commands virtually unanimous support on Capitol Hill. Why? Communities in various states are struggling to control the opioid epidemic that has created havoc in the US and affected every one irrespective of their age, race, and socioeconomic status. In this context, Medicaid, which helps low-income and disabled people, is the single largest payer for addiction treatment.

The Affordable Care Act – Hope for the poor

Those who are addicted to opiates need suitable treatment which is typically a combination of medication and therapy. Unfortunately, this treatment is beyond the reach of most poor people. The government has developed several programs to subsidize these treatments. The most beneficial among them has been the expansion of Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act.

Michael Botticelli, former Director, National Drug Control Policy, reports that the Affordable Care Act ensured substance use disorder treatment was one of the 10 important benefits which needed to be covered by the Medicaid and other health insurance market plans.

Republicans skeptical about Obamacare

Republicans from the Senate and the House are mulling significant reductions in Medicaid. But such measures could interfere with the addiction treatment currently being received by numerous people through the government-supported health insurance scheme.

While speaking with the Senate Homeland Security Subcommittee on Investigations, Dr. Terry Horton confessed that his primary fear is that these measures would prevent him from providing quality treatment to the addicts.

Republican initiatives to amend or repeal Obamacare while cutting down on Medicaid funding and passing the American Health Care Act would obstruct the current measures to control the opioid crisis.

It is important to remember that Donald Trump was one the most prominent supporters for combating the opioid epidemic. Throughout his presidential campaign, Mr. Trump had often criticized the Obama government for dealing with the epidemic in an ineffective way. He was also reported saying that it is unfortunate that a large section of the American population is grappling with fatal addiction. It would be cruel to aggravate their pain with impractical government policies which pose even more challenges before them while they’re trying to get support.

According to Dr. Frank, the inability to pay for treatment combined with a lack of preparedness among people is the key reason for such a sad scenario.

The American Health Care Act, initially appreciated by President Trump, currently calls for $800 billion Medicaid cuts.

Ben Allan from NPR says that the blocking of federal Medicaid would force states to manipulate the financial gap, either by offering limited care or by denying coverage to some people.

States dependent on federal funds

States like Pennsylvania expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act, and the state pays around 10 percent of the bills for individuals who benefited due to the expansion; government funds account for the remaining 90 percent.

Rachel Roubein reports that in states like Ohio, Alaska, and West Virginia, Medicaid covers approximately 34 to 50 percent of medication-based treatment for addiction disorders. Only with ample funding will the states be able to treat the addicts properly and ensure they recover completely.

Imagine the no-coverage scenario in rural areas- these areas will be severely affected, as Medicare is expensive and quite difficult to access in such remote places.

Government’s attitudes towards programs such as Medicaid need major transformation if the country has to control this terrible epidemic. In the absence of proper drug treatment medications, there is a high risk of patients going back to using opioids such as heroin so that they don’t feel sick. It seems that cutting Medicaid funds would intensify the problem and spell doom for addicts.

Opioid Crisis In America

New York Senator Schumer Demands Opioid Commission to Get its Act Together


Charles Schumer, Senate Minority Leader, recently called on the President’s ‘Combating Drug Addiction and the Opioid Crisis’ for creating a program that will help save struggling addicts in the country.


The senator was reported saying that he had never witnessed a worse scenario with such a significant percentage of the American population affected by drugs heroin, cocaine, crystal meth, and so on). He also highlighted the number of unfortunate deaths caused by overdoses as a result of the opioid epidemic.


Missed deadlines: Schumer


According to Schumer, the opioid commission under the newly elected US President has been delaying the development of a proper scheme that will help combat the rather serious drug problem in the nation.

He added that two deadlines for presenting a drug-addiction fighting plan had already been missed by the Trump administration. Schumer believes that the opioid epidemic is nothing short of a “national emergency”.


Instead of working on a strategy for battling the drug epidemic in the country, The Commission on Combating Drug Addiction and the Opioid Crisis is conducting additional literature reviews and hearings, reported Schumer. He said that this delay in finding a solution was a matter of resistance, not partisanship.


The powerful comments by Schumer are a follow up to the letter that was signed by him and nineteen other Senate officials. This letter was sent to Richard Baum, temporary director, Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) and pushed him to look into critical initiatives that may help provide quicker relief to the several million Americans battling severe drug addiction. The content of the letter critiqued the laid back attitude of the commission with regards to executing recommendations to fight the opioid epidemic. These recommendations were given by retired Surgeon General Vivek Murthy back in 2016.


The co-signers of the letter expressed their concern about the fact that while the Commission was making an effort to address the problem of drug addiction, there was a major delay in implementing the already available recommendations. The Senate Democrats also took the liberty to criticize Tom Price, Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS). The criticism was due to the fact that he had termed medication-based treatment for addressing opioid dependency (for example, with methadone or suboxone as “substitution of one drug with another”. Nearly 700 science and medical experts stepped in to correct this statement by Price. They said that medication had been utilized as a standard treatment for managing drug addiction for several years. Also, there was enough scientific proof to show that medicine-based treatment is, in fact, effective in addressing addiction.


Trump fails to live up to his initial claims


An executive order was signed by Trump in the month of March 2017 that allowed for the creation of the commission. It is chaired by the Governor of New Jersey, Chris Christie. The commission’s panel was directed to work in close association with the White House Office of American Innovation led by Jared Kushner, son-in-law to President Trump.


At the time when the commission was launched, Trump said that the epidemic in question is merciless and without any boundaries. He had promised that the commission would have immense compassion for the struggling addicts and work together to resolve this life-threatening problem in the country.


In June 2017, Schumer made an announcement to support a key initiative led by the University Of Rochester School Of Medicine and Monroe County. The initiative is aimed at creating a one-of-a-kind FP (forensic pathologists) fellowship program, away from New York City, for addressing the lack of sufficient forensic pathologists in the country needed to fight the opioid epidemic.

Robert Reich Explains


The Effects of the Repeal of Obamacare on Addiction Treatment Costs

The early part of 2010 witnessed the rolling out of new healthcare policies by the Obama administration. These policies were formulated to offer accessible and affordable health insurance cover to those Americans who were previously uninsured.

The Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment reported that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) or Obamacare had helped offer insurance cover to over 5 million individuals suffering from mental health and addiction problems.

One of the greatest benefits of the Affordable Care Act for addiction patients was that it covered the costs of rehab. Also, mental health and substance abuse disorders were listed as one of the ten EHBs or Essential Health Benefits that required coverage under the ACA health insurance system. In other words, the health insurance plans which met the guidelines of Obamacare for minimal coverage had to include insurance for addiction treatment.

Widespread concern over withdrawal of coverage

With the Congress working to withdraw the ACA, those with mental health disorders and addiction problems, along with their treatment providers and families, are worried about how patients will manage to maintain sobriety and good mental health in the absence of insurance cover.

The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration reports that almost 30 percent of the individuals who received coverage under the Medicaid expansion plan had some mental disorder (schizophrenia, anxiety) or substance abuse problem (alcohol, opioids).

Between 2015 and 2016, there was a 30 percent increase in the Medicaid expenditure on prescriptions for treating opioid abuse. New Hampshire, Kentucky, Ohio, and Massachusetts were among the states that reported the highest death rates due to opioid overdose in 2015.

Reduction in Medicaid Costs and No Tax Credits

The Better Care Reconciliation Act will cut down on the Medicaid federal funding and withdraw Medicaid expansion which offered coverage to nearly 11 million low-income citizens. In addition to this, it would also cause a fundamental restructuring of the program and transform Medicaid from an open benefit to something which allows limited spending only.

The repeal of the ACA without any replacement would be an extremely reckless decision. It is likely to have a very damaging effect on people with addiction and related disorders. Even a partial repeal of the Affordable Care Act would end up eliminating tax benefits which would minimize premiums for nearly 85 percent of the people who purchase insurance coverage on the state and federal exchanges. The majority of the people receiving tax benefits pay under $100 per month towards insurance. These people have minimal out-of-pocket expenses which make coverage affordable for them.

The benefit cuts were confirmed by the House of Republicans in a meeting last week. Republicans who form a part of the committee claim that the transformation would provide additional flexibility to states with regards to coverage decisions. They believe that states would not stop providing mental health and addiction coverage to recipients of Medicaid if required.

Learn More


The recent approval by the FDA, of the latest anti-seizure medication Epidiolex , has attracted a lot of new attention for CBD oil. But significant enthusiasm was already rising daily. CBD is being promoted as a “effective medical elixir” and marketed in everything from gummy bears, cosmetics to bottled water.

Cannabidiol was isolated in marijuana in 1940 and its chemical structure was discovered in 1965. It does not have any high, or euphoric effects and is increasingly being used in oils, edibles and other forms to treat chronic medical conditions such as pain and anxiety.

Last January, the World Health Organization released a study stating that “CBD is generally well tolerated with a good safety profile.” The WHO research study found “no evidence of recreational use of CBD oil or any public health related problems associated with the use of pure CBD.”

Last month the epidolex,   a CBD-based drug, to treat epileptic seizures caused by two exotic forms of childhood epilepsy, Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gestaut syndrome.  It was the only marijuana-based drug ever to be approved by the agency.

“In terms of solid evidence and research, the one fact we really know about water soluble CBD oil is that it can be helpful for rare childhood seizure disorders,” Ryan Vandrey, PhD, a cannabidiol researcher and associate professor of psychiatry at Johns Hopkins University, “There’s not yet sufficient evidence to support its use for any other reason.”


Drug Rehabilitation For Married Couples

Both partners in a marriage must be fully committed to getting clean for drug and alcohol addiction therapy to work. Recovery will not happen without a great deal of work. Couples attending drug treatment programs will obtain life skills and education that will help them cope with their addiction both individually and as a couple. Because the recovery process depends on a lifestyle change, it is imperative for couples to know and understand what clean and sober life will be like once they leave the addiction rehabilitation center.  

The professional counselors and staff who specialize in treating relationships will help the couple identify the causes behind their addiction to opioids and other drugs while simultaneously teaching them effective conflict resolution skills to use independently and as a couple. It is very important for a both partners to understand the challenges ahead of them and how they can work together to find solutions for those challenges. The group therapy aspect of their drug treatment program will give resolution skills for the couples’ personal and relationship issues that  affect their partner’s addiction. Married Couples will essentially need to learn how to coexist together in a new clean and sober environment, spending quality time together along with their children and enjoying life without the use of drugs or alcohol. While in drug rehab individual counseling sessions start after both addicted individuals has completed detox and withdrawal.  

When couples successfully completed rehabilitation programs, they stand a much higher rate of staying sober if they have the help of natural medication like kratom for alcohol withdrawal instead of suboxone and depending on support groups and one another and are both equally committed to staying clean and sober. Sometimes an added bonus is that many couples feel their relationship is much stronger after completing inpatient alcohol rehab and they have got clean together on a deeper level.


Addiction and ObamaCare

Amend 2012 is a campaign created for people—real people, not incorporated or limited liability people—who care about our democracy and want to be part of a solution.

The problem? Since January 2010, corporations have been legally allowed to spend unlimited amounts of money in our elections on behalf of candidates who, when elected, owe the corporations favors. So even though “we the people” go to the polls and vote for candidates, once they’re in office they must work on behalf of the corporate interests, not what’s good for American families.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a case called Citizens United vs. FEC that corporations have the same rights as people, and that their unlimited corporate spending is the same as our free speech. We disagree—because only people are people.

What’s the big deal? Corporations already use their money to make many decisions that affect us every day, so why do we care if they use their money in political campaigns? Because there’s no place for purchasing in democracy. Elected officials get their jobs from the people who elect them, and should ultimately answer to those people, too.

There’s a big difference between buying land to build a new warehouse and buying favors from the people who are supposed to represent us, the people.

What’s the big idea? Corporations don’t own our democracy yet, so we’re taking this movement to the people, going person-by-person and state-by-state, to build support for a constitutional amendment that will specify who are people (people) and who are not people (corporations).

Amending the Constitution is a big deal. It’ll require support of 2/3 of both the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives, and then must be ratified by 3/4 of the states. So while it’s possible and, we think, the best ultimate solution, it isn’t likely to happen right away.

Well what then? In the great tradition of American rabble rousing, we’re starting with the people, building grassroots support right where you live. Using a little-known but very powerful process called voter instructions, our goal is to have as many states as possible pass ballot resolutions calling on Congress to pass a constitutional amendment. Then people can vote to pass those resolutions.

Reverse Citizens United, because only people are people


University researchers reported the self-treatment of chronic pain and opioid withdrawal with kratom. The main alkaloid of kratom, mitragynine, binds mu- and kappa-opioid receptors, but has additional receptor benefits that might help its effectiveness at removing opioid withdrawal. The natural quantified history of kratom use, including its clinical pharmacology and toxicology, are not widely understood.We report the long term use of kratom for chronic pain treatment and opioid replacement therapy. Opiate pain killers and analgesics remain highly effective modalities for the treatment of chronic pain symptoms, but their long-term use is associated with the development of opioid addiction, abuse, dependence and mental disease, the incidence of which is increasing. Among individuals in the country with chronic pain who are maintained on morphine and percocet pills, gold kratom for pain is gaining awareness and popularity as a `natural’ alternative to physician-supervised opioid replacement therapy . We hear from many consumers who report positive results from kratom for alcohol withdrawal

Government Funding for Opioid Crisis

More than 90 Americans die each day due to overdosing on opioids. Don’t wait until it’s too late!


Opioids belong to a drug category that includes illegal drugs such as heroin and other strong pain relievers such as hydrocodone, fentanyl, morphine, oxycodone, etc. According to reports, more than 33,000 people died during 2015 due to opioid abuse. Now, with more than 1,000 people being treated in the United States for not taking opioid doses as prescribed by their doctors, opioid overdose has become a common reason for accidental deaths in the US and what is driving this epidemic, is opioid addiction.

History of the Problem

It all started during the late 1990s when pharmaceutical companies started showing their confidence in opioid painkillers and convinced the medical community that patients will not get addicted to them. This led to an increased number of prescriptions for opioids by doctors. However, their widespread misuse made it evident that these medications were extremely addictive. Over the years, as more and more people continue to get addicted to opioids, the number of deaths due to opioid abuse continues to rise.

Out of all the patients who are prescribed Opioids, between 8 to 12 percent of them develop an opioid use disorder.


This growing popularity of opioids is a cause of concern for all. Its misuse has created an opioid crisis. Therefore, people whose family members are addicted to opioid must find the correct drug rehab program for their loved ones or its abuse can end up taking their lives. They will find the withdrawal of the drug difficult so you must find rehab programs that make the process comfortable, do not offer other drug substitutes to get them off, and promise their complete recovery.

States also operate and sometimes even support certain drug rehab centers financially, providing them funds for opioid addicts. Patients who cannot afford to pay the costs for oxycontin detox programs are allowed to attend these programs free of charge. Home remedies for opiate withdrawal are a natural option for those who have no insurance coverage. The services offered by these state-sponsored recovery programs are equally beneficial for addicts and can help them recover.

How we can help

It is extremely difficult for most people to overcome an addiction without the help of professionals. A person is likely to stay trapped within their cycle of drug abuse unless they are under proper supervision and professional guidance.

We offer care that can help people in overcoming their drug abuse disorders, especially that of opioid. We provide them with comfortable healing and recovery processes and educate them about all the possible consequences that this addiction can have on them. We even help them develop the confidence required to face the world, hold true to their recovery and resist indulging in drug abuse again.

If you or your loved one is suffering from opioid addiction, please do not hesitate to get in touch with us. For further information, queries or help.


The Opioid Crisis Destroys Families and Marriages

One in 10 relationships are affected by heroin and other opioids. Married couples with children are being hit hard by drug abuse. When both partners in a relationship are addicted to drugs the children can be greatly affected. Substance abuse treatment centers usually do not allow couples married or not. Professional counselors do not treat both partners of a marriage at the same time. Each patient needs to have their own therapist. Couples drug rehab can be successful if done correctly. Facilities that specialize in relationships are not in every state, there are only a few in the country. Addiction treatment is not set up to help couples, it is set up to separate them. There needs to be more options for married couples to receive substance abuse treatment together. There are no state or federal funded programs for helping families with addiction issues. Medication assisted drug rehab using suboxone or vivitrol can be very helpful for this segment of the addicted population.



Addiction and ObamaCare

 Is Kratom The answer for opioid problem?

Many former opioid addicts are using kratom to replace pain medication or heroin.The research is starting to show good results for treatment of cravings. Big pharma is opposed to kratom because it also replaces suboxone or subutex and it is much safer. Resources for new users looking to buy kratom online are located on our contact page. It can be a complicated process to find the most effective kratom for addiction. There are such a wide variety of strains and colors including white vein, red vein , and green vein. Each country growing kratom has their own special strain like Indonesia, Bali, Thailand, Borneo. You can find kratom reviews at many websites also

5 Excellent Obamacare Benefits that will no longer be available to Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Patients

If your insurance does not cover you for addiction treatment there are not many options, most states do not offer free drug rehab centers. Here are some resources for meetings. One option is home remedies for opiate withdrawal which is all natural for getting off heroin or pain pills

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) was passed by President Barack Obama in 2010. This act was brought into effect with the aim of making quality healthcare accessible to a broader range of American citizens.

One of the healthcare areas that greatly benefitted from the ACA was ‘substance abuse and mental health’ treatment services. It is a well-known fact that treatment of addiction in the US isn’t cheap. But alcoholism and drug addiction affect nearly 15 to 20 percent of the US population. Therefore, addiction treatment needs to be affordable.

With the repeal of the Obamacare, addiction and mental health patients will no longer have access to some major benefits that were offered by the ACA. These include the following:

  1. Provision of insurance coverage

Addiction was seen as a moral shortcoming in the past. It meant that an individual had no self-control or was a “weak” or “bad” person if he/she took to drugs or alcohol. This was a good excuse for insurance companies to avoid giving coverage for any kind of rehabilitation or addiction treatment. But Obamacare changed that. It recognized that substance abuse is actually a ‘disease’ and like any other illness, it also needs proper treatment. Hence, all health insurance agencies were mandated to provide coverage for substance abuse and mental health treatments under the ACA.

  1. A new setting for treating substance abuse

The ACA also ensured that individuals suffering from pain pill addiction and substance abuse problems who have recently acquired coverage receive certain key benefits-change of treatment and access to behavioral health improvement services. In 2014, the act laid down ten compulsory “essential health benefits” or EHBs and substance abuse treatments were listed as one of the essential benefit categories.

  1. Expansion of private insurance and Medicaid

The individual mandate was the most significant provision of the ACA. The ACA created Affordable Insurance Marketplaces or Exchanges while subsidizing individual coverage bought through these exchanges for a certain category of individuals (earning up to 400% of FPL or Federal Poverty Level)

  1. Accountable and holistic care

Obamacare had a significant impact on numerous aspects of addiction treatment. The law affected several categories of people including the payers, providers, and clients. New care systems were experienced by providers and clients while payers had to come up with different ways of providing affordable, high-quality care. The focus of the ACA for addiction treatment was to offer coordinated and holistic care and develop a network of providers while making use of result-oriented payments for maximum accountability. kratom for alcohol withdrawal

  1. Normalization of addiction treatment

There had always been a stigma around substance abuse and mental illness and few people (even in medical centers) could accept it as a disease even though there is enough scientific research to support this claim. Obamacare helped bring addiction treatment at par with other medical offerings. In other words, seeking admission to a rehabilitation center, outpatient care and counseling was seen as a way of getting better. Addiction patients were seen as people who deserved support like any other routine patients.

buy kratom powder

Stand against unlimited campaign spending, vote for I-166

Stand against unlimited campaign spending, vote for I-166


Montanans have a choice this election: Speak up before your voice is drowned out entirely by big corporations with limitless money to spend on campaigns.

This is your chance to stand with Montanans, not the out-of-state interests that seek to buy our elections.

On your ballot, you’ll see state initiative I-166. You should vote FOR it. A vote FOR I-166 shows that you still believe it’s people, not corporations, who should call the shots in our political system.

Amend U.S. Constitution

I-166 calls on our leaders to amend the U.S. Constitution and re-institute limits on political spending. It would assert that corporations aren’t people, they shouldn’t be granted the same rights as people, and they certainly shouldn’t be allowed to buy elections.

I-166 is a chance to fight back against the bad Citizens United decision by the U.S. Supreme Court and more recent decisions that threaten to undo Montana’s century-old laws against political corruption. It’s an initiative supported strongly by Montana Republicans and Democrats alike.

I am a lifelong Republican and I served as Montana secretary of state from 1988 to 1989. I joined Gov. Brian Schweitzer, a Democrat, and Lt. Gov. John Bohlinger, a Republican, in signing the petition to place I-166 on the November ballot.

Unless we stand up, our nation will become steeped in the same sort of corruption that infected our state back in the days of the infamous Copper Kings.

Montana long ago learned a hard lesson about big money in politics when miner William A. Clark came upon a massive copper vein in Butte and overnight became one of the wealthiest men in the world. If he needed political favors, Clark paid for them. In 1899, when Clark decided he wanted to be a U.S. senator, he simply gave each corruptible state legislator the equivalent of $250,000 today and “won” the “election.”

Montanans got fed up with the corruption and fought back, passing the Corrupt Practices Act in 1912 and later banning large individual donations.

Under our state protections, candidates for state offices must raise money in small increments of no more than a few hundred dollars from an individual donor per election. A state legislator, for example, can’t accept more than $160.

Preserve democracy

These laws have allowed Montana to preserve a rare and true form of democracy, where citizens have access to government and nobody can buy their way to the front of the line.

But now, thanks to Citizens United and a more recent U.S. Supreme Court decision striking down Montana’s anti-corruption statute, our system is in jeopardy.

Just this month, a federal judge here in Montana struck down our limits on individual campaign contributions, immediately opening the floodgates for wealthy individuals to make unlimited contributions to local candidates they seek to influence. Fortunately, a circuit court put a stop to things, reinstating our limits for this election. But we may lose these protections for good if we don’t stand up now.

Corporations aren’t people and money isn’t speech. CEOs of corporations may choose to personally contribute to political campaigns, but they shouldn’t be allowed to use shareholders’ money to do so.

If we don’t protect the fairness of our elections, and the voice of individuals, corruption will follow. We don’t need out-of-state interests using big money to curry favor with politicians by bankrolling their campaigns. There’s a real possibility that foreign interests could get in the game, too. We don’t need countries like Saudi Arabia, Iran or China trying to buy U.S. politicians.

Vote FOR I-166. Corporations are not people, and your voice still counts.

Verner Bertelsen of Helena helped prepare the proponent argument FOR I-166 in the Voter Information Pamphlet


Read the original article in the Billings Gazette »